Our Engineering Services
China Speed
mit Methode und Know How
Engineering Efficiency
Safety Concept
Certification begins with a comprehensive safety concept
Certification begins with a comprehensive safety concept
A comprehensive safety concept is the foundation of functional safety. We develop, optimize, or complete your safety concept in accordance with ISO 26262, ISO 13849, or IEC 615
A systematic safety concept – quickly adaptable and comprehensive
A systematic safety concept – quickly adaptable and comprehensive
We offer proven, template-based solutions that can be easily adapted to your product. Whether you want to improve an existing concept and fill critical gaps, or create a new one from scratch—we provide all the necessary documents:
- Item Definition
- HARA
- Functional and Technical Safety Concept
- System Architecture
Safety Validation
One Thing is Certain: Failures Will Happen.
One Thing is Certain: Failures Will Happen.
Hardware and software errors do occur. The crucial thing is that they do not pose an unacceptable risk to human life. During safety validation, we demonstrate that the implemented safety functions detect such errors at an early stage and initiate effective countermeasures. This ensures that your product does not pose an unacceptable risk to people in accordance with the ALARP principle.
According to the European Regulation (EU) 2023/988 on General Product Safety (GPSR), manufacturers and, where applicable, importers are responsible for ensuring that a product demonstrably complies with the applicable safety requirements.
Demonstrate compliance. Protect lives.
Demonstrate compliance. Protect lives.
Analysis
Skillfully identify vulnerabilities and avoid changes
Skillfully identify vulnerabilities and avoid changes
We find the weak points. With our systematic methodology, technical expertise and experience from numerous projects - at system, hardware and software level. Our analyses follow recognized guidelines, such as the AIAG/VDA-FMEA for failure mode and effects analyses and the IEC 61025 für Fehlerbaumanalysen (FTA). Mit unserer eigenen, datenbankgestützten Methodik verbinden wir diese Standards zu einem konsistenten, nachvollziehbaren Gesamtbild – effizient, strukturiert und mit klarem Fokus auf die technische Wirksamkeit der Ergebnisse.
This makes risks visible before they become problems.
Insightful analyses. Stronger products
Insightful analyses. Stronger products
Whether it’s DFMEA, PFMEA, FTA, or DFA—our analysis methods comply with relevant guidelines, and their results deliver real added value for your product. Our methodology quickly identifies the risks in your product.
Specifications
Eliminate Ballast in Requirements Engineering.
Eliminate Ballast in Requirements Engineering.
We create the technical requirements for your system and all architectural elements, right down to the software units. In doing so, we optimize your requirements engineering with our "razor-sharp methodology" (customer statement), which creates clarity, ends discussions, and measurably reduces effort. This increases the benefits for everyone involved—visibly and comprehensibly.
A razor-sharp methodology
A razor-sharp methodology
Developers are familiar with the problem: Standards like ISO 26262 often feel like a waste of time. Countless hours are spent on requirements attributes, traceability, revisions, and inspections—and when a major product change is on the horizon, the workload skyrockets. Frustration is inevitable.
This is exactly where our “razor-sharp methodology” comes into play (as one client put it). It puts an end to endless debates about “good requirements”—whether they are “atomic,” “necessary,” or “not a design requirement.”
Leverage your requirements engineering efforts to benefit product development. With our razor-sharp methodology.
Test Management
Increase Confidence in the Product.
Increase Confidence in the Product.
We develop the test strategy, test plan, and test cases. Using our methodology, we identify the appropriate tests and eliminate redundancies.